<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RadiantView PhotoBlog &#187; abstract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.radiantviewphotography.com/index.php/tag/abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.radiantviewphotography.com</link>
	<description>Photography of Tim Pennington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Swirling Lavender</title>
		<link>http://blog.radiantviewphotography.com/index.php/2009/08/18/swirling-lavender/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.radiantviewphotography.com/index.php/2009/08/18/swirling-lavender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Pennington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lavender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.radiantviewphotography.com/index.php/2009/08/18/swirling-lavender/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  
I recently came across a small patch of beautiful lavender flowers.   Unfortunately the patch was too small for anything except perhaps a macro shot, which wasn&#8217;t in the cards with the wind conditions that day and the fact that I didn&#8217;t have my tripod with me.  I know, I should never leave home [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2601/3826675541_5340f32610.jpg" alt="Lavender Swirl" vspace="10" width="500" align="top" border="5" height="333" hspace="10" /></p>
<p>I recently came across a small patch of beautiful lavender flowers.   Unfortunately the patch was too small for anything except perhaps a macro shot, which wasn&#8217;t in the cards with the wind conditions that day and the fact that I didn&#8217;t have my tripod with me.  I know, I should never leave home without it.</p>
<p>So, working with what I had, I decided try one of the &#8220;rule breaking&#8221; techniques I learned about from a talk <a href="http://www.josephrossbach.com/" title="Joseph Rossbach Photography" target="_blank">Joseph Rossbach</a> gave to our photo club recently.   Using a small aperture to create a long (1/4 of a second) shutter speed, I deliberately moved the camera while taking the image.  In this first picture, the motion was a rotation with a little zooming of the lens at the same time.  In the 2nd image, the motion was more of an arch shape.</p>
<p>Whether this work is up to individual taste.  Personally, I think this type of photography is really cool, perhaps just because it&#8217;s such a contrast to the normal  &#8220;keep things still&#8221; mindset.   I really like how the circular lines in the 1st image tend to draw your eye to the lavender flower at rotation center that is still in focus.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3827473354_cbbd25f3a8.jpg" alt="Lavender Swirl 2" vspace="10" width="500" align="bottom" border="5" height="333" hspace="10" /></p>
<p>At the same time, these images are a challenge as they force both the viewer and photographer to consider shapes and lines more than the technical details of the shot.</p>
<p>What is your opinion?  Do these images work for you or are they just a waste of pixels?  I&#8217;d love to hear your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.radiantviewphotography.com/index.php/2009/08/18/swirling-lavender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
